Psst...

Do you want to get language learning tips and resources every week or two? Join our mailing list to receive new ways to improve your language learning in your inbox!

Join the list

English Audio Request

maiphuonghaha
366 Words / 1 Recordings / 3 Comments
Note to recorder:

Please read the essay at your normal speed. If you find any phrases unnatural, please help me change them. Thank you!

Changing Jobs

Topic: The job market today is very competitive and it is best to choose a career or field of study early in order to get a good job later in life. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Model answer:

Today’s hyper-competitive job market encourages parents and educators to push specialization at increasingly earlier ages. Although choosing a career early on is a safe option, it will not produce the best results in my opinion.

The reason that opting in to a career from an early age has become so prevalent is that it affords people a sense of security that is at least somewhat justified. In Vietnam, the vast majority of High School graduates are pushed early by their parents into safe fields like finance and the sciences. There are a number of hard skills required for these fields such as good mathematical acumen, industriousness, and logical thinking. If students start to learn these skills at a very young age or beginning in High School then they will have a head start on their peers that can continue through university into the job market. This is the theory that guides specialization.

It is difficult to dispute the above logic, however, recent research has shown that having a breadth of knowledge and experience is a much better predictor of future success. A recent book by David Epstein titled ‘Range’ debunked the commonly held belief that early specialization is safer. In fact, the majority of leaders in their fields experimented with a large number of subject areas and professions before settling on one. The early specialisers were the exceptions and are therefore a poor model to imitate. The core argument of that book is that experience in multiple fields helps you to make connections and learn a diverse range of skills that you can later bring to bear on your chosen profession.

In conclusion, having a range of experience is more important than locking yourself into a field of study early in order to enhance later career options. Universities ought to make a shift to adopt some of the principles of liberal arts schools to better prepare graduates for an uncertain future world economy.

Recordings

  • Changing Jobs ( recorded by JimBob2066 ), American

    Download Unlock
    Corrected Text
    more↓

    Changing Jobs

    Topic: The job market today is very competitive, and it is best to choose a career or field of study early to get a good job later in life. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

    Model answer:
    Today’s hyper-competitive job market encourages parents and educators to push specialization at increasingly earlier ages. Although choosing a career early on is a safe option, it will not produce the best results, in my opinion.

    Opting for a career from an early age has become so prevalent because it affords people a sense of security that is at least somewhat justified. In Vietnam, the vast majority of High School graduates are pushed early by their parents into safe fields like finance and the sciences. Good mathematical acumen, diligence, and logical thinking are examples of hard skills required for these fields. The theory behind specialization is that learning these skills when young will offer a head start over peers. These skills will then continue through college and into the job market.

    It is difficult to dispute the above logic; however, recent research has shown that having a breadth of knowledge and experience is a much better predictor of future success. A recent book by David Epstein titled ‘Range’ debunked the commonly held belief that early specialization is safer. The majority of leaders in their fields experimented with many subject areas and professions before settling on one. The early specializers were the exceptions and are therefore not a good model to imitate. Epstein argues that experience in multiple fields helps you make connections and learn a diverse range of skills that you can later bring to your chosen profession.

    In conclusion, having a range of experience is more important than locking yourself into a field of study early to enhance later career options. Universities ought to shift to adopt some of the principles of liberal arts schools to better prepare graduates for an uncertain future world economy.

Comments

JimBob2066
April 11, 2021

I have made some changes to the text, so it flows better. Part 1
Changing Jobs
Topic: The job market today is very competitive, and it is best to choose a career or field of study early to get a good job later in life. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Model answer:
Today’s hyper-competitive job market encourages parents and educators to push specialization at increasingly earlier ages. Although choosing a career early on is a safe option, it will not produce the best results, in my opinion.

JimBob2066
April 11, 2021

Part 2
Opting for a career from an early age has become so prevalent because it affords people a sense of security that is at least somewhat justified. In Vietnam, the vast majority of High School graduates are pushed early by their parents into safe fields like finance and the sciences. Good mathematical acumen, diligence, and logical thinking are examples of hard skills required for these fields. The theory behind specialization is that learning these skills when young will offer a head start over peers. These skills will then continue through college and into the job market.

JimBob2066
April 11, 2021

Part 3.
It is difficult to dispute the above logic; however, recent research has shown that having a breadth of knowledge and experience is a much better predictor of future success. A recent book by David Epstein titled ‘Range’ debunked the commonly held belief that early specialization is safer. The majority of leaders in their fields experimented with many subject areas and professions before settling on one. The early specializers were the exceptions and are therefore not a good model to imitate. Epstein argues that experience in multiple fields helps you make connections and learn a diverse range of skills that you can later bring to your chosen profession.
In conclusion, having a range of experience is more important than locking yourself into a field of study early to enhance later career options. Universities ought to shift to adopt some of the principles of liberal arts schools to better prepare graduates for an uncertain future world economy.